Tuesday, May 1, 2012

First Time-A Review of "Love Only Once"

Book Title: Love Only Once
Author: Johanna Lindsey
Version: ebook
ISBN: 9780062106575
Voice: Third Person
Publisher: Avon
First Published: December 1985
Number of ebook pages: 254
Genre: Romance

SYNOPSIS: It is 1817 in London and Regina Ashton goes to stay with her Uncle the Lord Edward Malory and his wife Lady Charlotte and their children. Regina, a young stunning, head strong woman who has been raised by her four uncles since she was orphaned, has come to London to find a husband. Tired of looking for the husband that will suit all of her uncles Regina comes up with a plan to let her uncles pick one for her. On the night of the much anticipated ball Regina decides to visit her Uncle Anthony and tell him of her plan. Borrowing Selena Eddington's carriage she makes her way to her uncle's home.

Dashing Nicholas Eden, who is a rogue of the highest order, happens to be Selena's lover sees the carriage and decides to play a little trick. Figuring he would punish Selena for trying to make him jealous, Nicholas swoops up on the woman getting into the carriage and carries her off on his horse and takes her as prisoner to his house. Knowing how important the ball was to Selena Nicholas locks her in a room and heads to the ball. Imagine his surprise when he sees that Selena is happy and dancing, free in the world. Realizing his mistake he rushes home to find a very beautiful, very amused Regina Ashton waiting for him. Once they figure things out, Nicholas decides that he must bed Regina, right around the time that Regina realizes the only way out of the scandal is that she must wed Nicholas.

The whole thing is made worse when Nicholas flat out refuses to marry Regina claiming that he will never marry, all because of a dark secret from his past. When he is ambushed by Regina's family as well as his aunt and grandmother he finally consents to the engagement. While at a party celebrating their new engagement Nicholas finally gets his way and has sex with Regina in the garden. Afterward thinking that things have finally turned in her favor Regina heads toward their wedding happy and feeling on top of the world, despite Nicholas's threats that he will find a way out of the marriage. The wedding goes over without a hitch and on their wedding night Nicholas takes Regina to his estate in the country where his evil mother lives and then proceeds to leave her there alone.

Although there are many adventures that take place through out the story the real question that is dominent is will Nicholas and Regina make it as a loving couple? Will Nicholas's secret be revealed? If it is will it be enough to push Regina away?

REVIEW: This marks the first ever plain old romance that I have read. No vampires, no werewolves, no shapeshifters, no magic and nothing paranormal. Just plain old damsal in distress, rogueish handsome man taking away her virtue type of plot. Simple, easy to read, and really not worth it. It is the beginning of a series that for some reason has become hugely popular. Maybe I am a reading snob but this is just not my cup of tea. The story was boring and way predictable, there really wasn't even anything that made the story stand out from a lot of other english novels, romance or not. The only difference between this novel and many of the other english victorian era, zipped up but not really, style novels is that this one has a sex scene or two in it.

The writing was pretty mediocre as well, there were phrases in there that actually hurt me to read. It was pedestrian and disappointing, even the secret mystery about some of the characters wasn't very mysterious. It was as if Johanna Lindsey was trying hard to jumble together every type of writing possible. And she just tried way to hard. "Love Only Once" is not anything that I would recommend. I have a friend that loves this series and reads everything by Johanna Lindsey but this is not anything that I can get on board with.

I was disappointed in the whole thing and rather surprised that I actually finished the book. I don't need Tolstoy-esque writing in everything I read and I don't need Austenian level plot but there needs to be something to latch onto for a book to capture my interest. A good story, or a good character to root for, great writing that covers a poor story. Something, anything that can make the read worth the while. But this was poor story on top of poor writing, on top of annoying characters. There was nothing redeeming about it. So this is not a good review, this is not a review for your next book it is instead a review for the next book to be avoided. This should not be the book you pick up if you are looking for a good romance. Stick to the paranormal kind, at least that way you get a little bit of fighting and silly creatures thrown in the mix.  

3 comments:

  1. I feel the same way about English romance novels. Now, English mystery is another story.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just wanted to point out that Jane Austen's novels all end the exact same way, with two characters married at the end. You can actually argue that in a lot of ways, her plots are just as predictable as the Romance Novels of today.

    Additionally, in the Romance genre itself is a certain level of necessity for predictable plot. The narrowness of the definition of "Romance" requires that there be a romance within the scope of the novel. In fact, failure to adhere to this prevents the novel from being included in the genre. Everything, regardless of whether it's Highlander, Period, or Paranormal, in the Romance genre needs to fit within certain parameters. How much you enjoy the extras (some don't care for vampires, but enjoy the idea of the Scottish warriors crossing the paths of English ladies, and all the fighting that can occur within that context; some want the draw of inflexible social boundaries that must be broken, and absolutely no physical violence outside the threat of maybe a duel of honor) is the only real "choice" beyond the concept of Two People Will Meet And Fall In Love.

    Just as it would be unfair to judge a Western for being set in a predictable location, it's unfair to judge a Romance novel as being predictable for it's plot. I feel that a stronger review would be to evaluate this novel within the context of its genre and what the novelist was trying to accomplish (wish fulfillment, addressing the concern of modern women on romantic encounters, providing an outlet for desires that are not practical in our day, etc), rather than in the context of cross-genre comparison (even cross-sub-genre comparison).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Athena thank you for the comments!! And yes I do know that all Austen novels end with people married at the end, I didn't really mean that when I spoke of Austenian plot, but thanks for the reminder (it has been awhile since I read a few of those).

    I would just like to point out that I do indeed realize that all romance novels have to have something romance in them to be considered part of the Romance genre, just as all Fantasy novels have to have something within them to be considered Fantasy. I was not commenting on the perdicitibility in regards to the romance aspect but just more the way the story developed. I've never read 'regular' romance but I have read a lot of paranormal romance and even some of the highlander type, not all great but at least they had some surprises within the perdicitibility. I was merely stating that this particular book had nothing to really capture me.

    And though Austen novels may all end the same way and have perdictible plots but at least the writing is good and the characters are well thought out and tangible. Her female characters are three dimensional and funny, strong and vocal. Whereas this female character, although maybe a bit stubborn, is still the damsal in distress trying to get married. So Austen novels still have something to them in my opinion.

    One more point this is my review, what I think and feel about this book. I reviewed it the way I wanted to review it and I stick to it. I appreciate your comments about maybe not comparing genres but I didn't truly compare and contrast. I simply mentioned the sub-genre of paranormal romance as a fun way to say that with that genre has silly creatures. =D Thanks for reading and commenting! =D

    ReplyDelete